RudderStack and Amperity both are platforms that allow you to sync data to downstream marketing destinations like CRM tools, email tools, and advertising platforms. Both platforms have the functionality to collect events via an SDK, and functionality to resolve identities.
However, there are plenty of differences across feature sets, functionality, usability, and more. Below we take a deep-dive into both platforms to highlight the differences.
Compare RudderStack and Amperity
| Functionality | Rudderstack | Amperity |
|---|---|---|
| Data Collection | Client-side, server-side, & other 3rd-party sources | Client-side, server-side, & other 3rd-party sources |
| Data Storage | Your existing data infrastructure (data warehouse, data lake, or database) | Amperity's managed infrastructure |
| Data Retention | Unlimited lookback & history | Variable |
| Data Schema | Controlled by you (supports any custom entity or object) | Controlled by Amperity (opinionated data models centered around user profiles) |
| Audience Management | Limited audience-building capabilities for non-technical users | No-code audience builder (limited to data stored in Amperity) |
| Journey Orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Identity Resolution | Warehouse-native, code-based, deterministic IDR | Supports both probabilistic & ML algorithms in Amperity's managed infrastructure |
| Identity Graph Storage Location | Lives in your warehouse | Owned by Amperity |
| Reverse ETL | Available with limited capabilities (visual mapping is not available for all destinations) | NA |
| Real-Time Audience Computation | Dependent upon data landing in the warehouse | Yes (limited to clickstream/behavioral data with no time-based lookbacks) |
| Real-Time Streaming (Event Forwarding) | Yes | Yes |
| Low-Latency Profile API | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming Reverse ETL | Yes | No |
| Data Activation Flow | Data warehouse to destination | Amperity to Destination |
| Activation Destinations | 200+ | 70+ |
| Source of Truth | Single: Your owned data warehouse | Multiple: Amperity & your owned data warehouse |
| Security & Compliance | Can be configured to be GDPR, CCPA, & HIPAA compliant | Data lives outside of your cloud infrastructure (can be configured to be GDPR, CCPA, & HIPAA compliant) |
| Pricing | Dependent on event volume & add-on features | Bundled pricing: dependent on monthly tracked users (MTUs) & feature add-ons |
| Proof of Concept (POC) | Variable | 4-6+ months |
Pros and Cons of RudderStack
Pros
- Open-source SDKs
- Can leverage your existing data platform for underlying storage
- Supports ETL pipelines to ingest data in addition to event collection
Cons
- Not marketer-friendly (built for data teams)
- Audience builder is difficult to use
- Identity resolution mapping/merging logic is inflexible & purely deterministic
- Reverse ETL is limited & underdeveloped
Pros and Cons of Amperity
Pros
- Strong identity resolution offerings
- Non-supported cloud sources can be ingested into Amperity via Fivetran ETL pipelines
- Implementation support via solution architects
Cons
- Not marketer-friendly
- Long implementation time & difficult setup process
- Pricing is based on MTUs
- Limited number of activation destinations
Should I Buy RudderStack or Amperity?
Before you purchase a customer data platform, there are a few important factors to consider:
-
Time-to-value: You need to show ROI quickly to your internal stakeholders to validate that the platform can provide business value. Many customer data platforms can take upwards of 6-12 months to implement and get started.
-
Usability: Tools like Segment and ActionIQ can come with steep learning curves that make them difficult to use, especially for non-technical marketing teams. It doesn't matter how good the technology is if your marketing team doesn't use it.
-
Functionality: Before you purchase any tool you need to ensure that it has functionality to solve your business-specific use cases, and that means supporting your proprietary data. Your main goal should be to purchase a solution that actually solves the problem you're facing.
-
Flexibility: Not every company is the same. Make sure the tool you're purchasing can dynamically adapt and conform to your data. Otherwise, you'll end with a failed implementation and an upset marketing team.
What's the Best Alternative to RudderStack and Amperity?
Hightouch is a Composable Customer Data Platform that is the perfect alternative to both Segment and ActionIQ because the platform offers the following:
Fast Implementation: Hightouch enables you to start activating your data immediately. The average customer is powering live use cases within weeks and sometimes days.
Ease-of-Use: Hightouch was specifically built for non-technical users. The platform has an easy-to-use audience builder, built-in analytics, and experimentation and measurement capabilities your marketers can drive value and optimize performance without getting blocked by your data team.
Completeness: Hightouch offers a complete suite of capabilities to collect data, resolve identities, build audiences, sync data to any destination, and increase match rates. You won't end up with a bloated tech stack because you can select the functionalities you need for your specific use cases.
Flexibility: The Composable CDP approach that Hightouch provides allows you to have the most flexible data activation solution. Unlike traditional CDPs, Hightouch lets you access any data in your organization and use any schema structure imaginable to power your most complicated marketing use cases.
Our team of experts at Hightouch is comprised of former CDP experts, so if you have any questions about CDPs, schedule some time with a Hightouch expert so we can point you in the right direction.
